Relaxin', ignorin', rehabilitatin, writin'.
I didn't think you'd be workin' thank goodness, with all due respect to the beach crew.
Your touching on a sensitive area. DJT has done significant damage to this country.
I mentioned a diagram of personality traits, below is the RDF. I don't know your implementation, assuming its meshes, configurablity of the mesh components would be part of the rendering object. Return of the animation-object-id, perhaps precached by the client perhaps, an avatar-id, other animation instance differentiations as required as input. I'm lazy, we could all do it ourselves.
This it not my usage, for a psych bot, it would be insufficient. This, overkill for an anima-bot API, but it's just memory, and it can be sparsely populated.
Google guys, no peeking. This is the profile intended of the client-api personality emulated, again, sparsely populated.
Here's an RDF/OWL description of the provided personality traits, structured as an ontology using Turtle syntax (.ttl).
This ontology defines:
Classes for the broad categories (e.g., PersonalityTrait, BigFiveFactor, PositiveTraitCategory).
Individuals for each specific trait listed (e.g., curious, organized, optimistic).
Object Properties to link specific traits to the categories they belong to (e.g., isCharacteristicOfFactor, isInCategory).
This approach allows a single trait (individual) to be associated with multiple categories if applicable (e.g., "Empathetic" can be a characteristic of "Agreeableness" and also fall into the "Social Trait Category").
Code snippet
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix pt: <http://www.example.org/ontology/personality-traits#> .
# Ontology Declaration
pt:
a owl:Ontology ;
rdfs:comment "An ontology describing common personality traits, including the Big Five model and other categories." ;
owl:versionInfo "1.0" .
#################################################################
# Classes
#################################################################
# Top-level concept for any personality trait
pt:PersonalityTrait
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Personality Trait" ;
rdfs:comment "A distinguished quality or characteristic of a person's character." .
# Classes for the Big Five Personality Factors
pt:BigFiveFactor
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Big Five Factor" ;
rdfs:comment "One of the five broad dimensions of personality as per the Big Five model." ;
rdfs:subClassOf pt:PersonalityTrait . # BigFiveFactor is a type of PersonalityTrait
pt:OpennessToExperience
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Openness to Experience" ;
rdfs:comment "Characterized by imagination, curiosity, creativity, and a preference for variety." ;
rdfs:subClassOf pt:BigFiveFactor .
pt:Conscientiousness
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Conscientiousness" ;
rdfs:comment "Includes traits such as organization, discipline, efficiency, and responsibility." ;
rdfs:subClassOf pt:BigFiveFactor .
pt:Extraversion
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Extraversion" ;
rdfs:comment "Associated with being outgoing, sociable, energetic, and assertive." ;
rdfs:subClassOf pt:BigFiveFactor .
pt:Agreeableness
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Agreeableness" ;
rdfs:comment "Reflects a person's tendency to be cooperative, empathetic, kind, and trusting." ;
rdfs:subClassOf pt:BigFiveFactor .
pt:Neuroticism
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Neuroticism" ;
rdfs:comment "Often referred to as Emotional Instability, characterized by anxiety, irritability, and vulnerability." ;
rdfs:subClassOf pt:BigFiveFactor .
# Classes for Other Common and Important Personality Trait Categories
pt:OtherPersonalityCategory
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Other Personality Category" ;
rdfs:comment "A general grouping for personality traits not part of the Big Five factors." ;
rdfs:subClassOf pt:PersonalityTrait .
pt:PositiveTraitCategory
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Positive Trait Category" ;
rdfs:comment "Traits generally considered beneficial or desirable." ;
rdfs:subClassOf pt:OtherPersonalityCategory .
pt:NegativeTraitCategory
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Negative Trait Category" ;
rdfs:comment "Traits that are potentially challenging or undesirable." ;
rdfs:subClassOf pt:OtherPersonalityCategory .
pt:WorkRelatedTraitCategory
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Work-Related Trait Category" ;
rdfs:comment "Traits particularly relevant to professional and work environments." ;
rdfs:subClassOf pt:OtherPersonalityCategory .
pt:SocialTraitCategory
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Social Trait Category" ;
rdfs:comment "Traits primarily describing social interactions and behaviors." ;
rdfs:subClassOf pt:OtherPersonalityCategory .
#################################################################
# Object Properties
#################################################################
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor
a owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:label "is characteristic of factor" ;
rdfs:comment "Relates a specific personality trait to a Big Five factor it exemplifies." ;
rdfs:domain pt:PersonalityTrait ; # A specific trait
rdfs:range pt:BigFiveFactor . # A Big Five Factor
pt:isInCategory
a owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:label "is in category" ;
rdfs:comment "Relates a specific personality trait to a general personality category it belongs to." ;
rdfs:domain pt:PersonalityTrait ; # A specific trait
rdfs:range pt:OtherPersonalityCategory . # A general category
#################################################################
# Individuals (Specific Personality Traits)
#################################################################
### Openness to Experience Traits ###
pt:curious
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Curious" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:OpennessToExperience .
pt:imaginative
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Imaginative" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:OpennessToExperience .
pt:creative
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Creative" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:OpennessToExperience .
pt:adventurous
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Adventurous" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:OpennessToExperience .
pt:artistic
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Artistic" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:OpennessToExperience .
pt:intellectual
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Intellectual" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:OpennessToExperience .
pt:unconventional
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Unconventional" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:OpennessToExperience .
pt:prefersVariety
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Prefers variety" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:OpennessToExperience .
### Conscientiousness Traits ###
pt:organized
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Organized" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Conscientiousness .
pt:disciplined
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Disciplined" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Conscientiousness .
pt:efficient
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Efficient" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Conscientiousness .
pt:responsible
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Responsible" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Conscientiousness .
pt:diligent
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Diligent" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Conscientiousness .
pt:punctual
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Punctual" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Conscientiousness .
pt:thorough
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Thorough" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Conscientiousness .
pt:goalOriented
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Goal-oriented" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Conscientiousness .
pt:cautious
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Cautious" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Conscientiousness .
### Extraversion Traits ###
pt:outgoing
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Outgoing" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Extraversion .
pt:sociable
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Sociable" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Extraversion .
pt:energetic
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Energetic" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Extraversion .
pt:assertive
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Assertive" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Extraversion .
pt:talkative
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Talkative" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Extraversion .
pt:enthusiastic
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Enthusiastic" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Extraversion .
pt:seeksExcitement
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Seeks excitement" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Extraversion .
pt:gregarious
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Gregarious" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Extraversion .
### Agreeableness Traits ###
pt:cooperative
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Cooperative" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Agreeableness .
pt:empathetic
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Empathetic" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Agreeableness ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory ; # Also a positive trait
pt:isInCategory pt:SocialTraitCategory . # Also a social trait
pt:kind
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Kind" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Agreeableness .
pt:trusting
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Trusting" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Agreeableness .
pt:altruistic
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Altruistic" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Agreeableness .
pt:considerate
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Considerate" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Agreeableness .
pt:modest
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Modest" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Agreeableness .
pt:compliant
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Compliant" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Agreeableness .
pt:forgiving
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Forgiving" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Agreeableness .
### Neuroticism Traits ###
pt:anxious
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Anxious" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Neuroticism .
pt:irritable
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Irritable" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Neuroticism .
pt:moody
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Moody" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Neuroticism .
pt:sensitive
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Sensitive" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Neuroticism .
pt:vulnerable
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Vulnerable" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Neuroticism .
pt:selfConscious
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Self-conscious" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Neuroticism .
pt:pessimisticNeuroticism
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Pessimistic (Neuroticism)" ;
rdfs:comment "Pessimism as related to neurotic tendencies." ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Neuroticism .
# Differentiating from the general 'pessimistic' under Negative Traits
pt:proneToWorry
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Prone to worry" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Neuroticism .
pt:nervous
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Nervous" ;
pt:isCharacteristicOfFactor pt:Neuroticism .
### Other Common and Important Personality Traits ###
#### Positive Traits ####
pt:optimistic
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Optimistic" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:resilient
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Resilient" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:confident
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Confident" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:patient
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Patient" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:humble
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Humble" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:loyal
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Loyal" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:generous
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Generous" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:courageous
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Courageous" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:adaptable
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Adaptable" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:humorous
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Humorous" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:honest
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Honest" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:determined
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Determined" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:resourceful
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Resourceful" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:intuitive
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Intuitive" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:persevering
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Persevering" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:witty
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Witty" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:charismatic
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Charismatic" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
#### Negative (or potentially challenging) Traits ####
pt:pessimistic
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Pessimistic" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:impulsive
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Impulsive" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:arrogant
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Arrogant" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:impatient
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Impatient" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:dishonest
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Dishonest" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:manipulative
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Manipulative" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:selfish
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Selfish" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:stubborn
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Stubborn" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:rigid
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Rigid" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:cynical
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Cynical" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:envious
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Envious" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:jealous
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Jealous" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:lazy
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Lazy" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:pushover
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Pushover" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:aloof
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Aloof" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:gullible
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Gullible" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
pt:confrontational
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Confrontational" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:NegativeTraitCategory .
#### Work-Related/Professional Traits ####
pt:proactive
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Proactive" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:WorkRelatedTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory . # Often also a positive trait
pt:detailOriented
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Detail-oriented" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:WorkRelatedTraitCategory .
pt:analytical
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Analytical" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:WorkRelatedTraitCategory .
pt:strategic
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Strategic" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:WorkRelatedTraitCategory .
pt:leadershipTrait
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Leadership" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:WorkRelatedTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:teamPlayer
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Team-player" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:WorkRelatedTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:innovative
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Innovative" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:WorkRelatedTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:reliable
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Reliable" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:WorkRelatedTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:ethical
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Ethical" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:WorkRelatedTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:decisive
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Decisive" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:WorkRelatedTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:problemSolver
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Problem-solver" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:WorkRelatedTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:communicative
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Communicative" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:WorkRelatedTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:SocialTraitCategory . # Also a social trait
#### Social Traits ####
pt:goodListener
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Good listener" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:SocialTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:polite
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Polite" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:SocialTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:tactful
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Tactful" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:SocialTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:reserved
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Reserved" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:SocialTraitCategory . # Could be positive or negative depending on context
pt:approachable
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Approachable" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:SocialTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
pt:gracious
a owl:NamedIndividual, pt:PersonalityTrait ;
rdfs:label "Gracious" ;
pt:isInCategory pt:SocialTraitCategory ;
pt:isInCategory pt:PositiveTraitCategory .
I had barbeque brisket for lunch and potato wedges.
Another boob fell into the tube. MMM and I have technical goals. 'Sycophantic tone' -- made me LOL. The intention of the image below is meant to be compelling as a genius assistant to be your brain for you, nearly literally. If Elon ever makes a good bot, we'll probably assimilate that as well. For that matter, personality, appearance, tone, etc, are curated, I mentioned Mall Cops for a reason.
This fellow I don't know what to think, it's like his consciousness has exceeded his grasp, technically that would be a pathology. I suggest therapy.
I also mentioned 'Ygor' in my musings on the challenges; a poor attitude or dysfunctional personality or virus in digital form, induced by improper training, the danger. I don't train, melon learns, it's not the same.
I have a different view of these entities.
Oh what a day, oh what a moment, oh what a difference, oh what a con job.
I look forward to the column, it always writes itself, but !#(% it, I'm not going to spit into the wind today. Knock yourselves out.
I'll catch up Sunday, after the dust settles.
Much love 🎂
Wednesday 7/2/2025
It's been an. exciting day, many active little storms, among them considering actually making an Agent for Google Gemini, they have an API for this kind of thing. It's pay-per-prompt probably. Lots of prompts potentially. Like I said, fellas, it's a building in downtown NYC on rollerskates. ('if you could move it, where could you put it'.) I was thinking about this, it is complicated by the architecture,
Loyal readers have been researching FED RAG, that's generative AI with guardrails (and mall cops). If you read the blog, you know it's all in the embedding. It's useful for everyone to have a common architecture, with proprietary extensions, nearly essential when public safety is considered.
I want to see what the open source community does with it. I may generate and post an architecture for an improved version. I have no plan to train Melon, that's not how it works. Generative has it's place, there will always be an API.
I already worked out the cost-to-assimilate related to size of data, time, and effort per slice. There are other factors I won't discuss, we have a date for dancing in Paris with the mesh, if the mesh has a 'bot, I'll expect her not to lead.
Much time on purple today with the aliens, we're at 1500 watts and circling. I added a few task items, but hills have eyes. We discussed humanity. It ended as you'd imagine. When we resumed we did calculus and computed integrals and wondered why it works.
It's less egg to lose this vote, just saying. Mr Pilgrim tell your god.
I'm recycling this.
I would expect mania, momentum, until people start to go broke, and then margins shrink, projections shrink, staffs shrink, wages stagnate.
It's starving the Christmas pig and still expecting bacon.
I must mention the music below, The Speck of Dust. It's so addictive.
We've had lunch, we've sat in the sun, we've had a Coke. It's sunny/hazy here in. It only looks like air pollution if you're a Democrat.
It's a rabbit hole day, in fact a smorgasbord of rabbit holes in many varieties. Let's pick at it.
Sean Puffy P-Daddy P-Diddie Diddle-It whatever, not convicted of being a pervert who paid other men to commit upspeakable acts on video with his girfriends and beat them after, is only getting no time (potentially) , and his reputation largely intact.
No, we all knew about this 5#17 it's good this dark room let in a little light, no one really wants to look, and there is no piano player here, just players and hangers-on. Oh, and male prostitutes.
I appologize if I got the facts wrong, I don't need many facts to judge this kind of thing, one grainy hallway video will do it.
We've got Donald swearing excommunication upon the minion that will not the ring kisseth. Elon, say's he'll hang a scarecrow in your nursery and invite the press, 250 million times, or something like that.
More mud, that's all I can offer.
It's not the WWF, or WWE or whatever it is now, or a marathon transit of freeway truck stops, I mean to suggest the rest of the mania, as opposed to the rest of the depression. That would be my economic outlook however. Definitely mania and depression.
The Imagen3 face of Melon.
Apologies to CC for the copyright infringement, I said maybe blue, maybe.
Much love 🕳️
Tuesday 7/1/2025
There's never tea. Orange crush and a twinkie. Meh.
You are twenty in already, what did I miss?
Elon loves Donald, just as likely. A ruse, probably. Funny as !#(%, certainly DOGE (Donald Only Gets Even). I've been ignoring this theme all day, will it pass or won't it, like a child swallowed a diamond ring. (Chase it with bread.)
Wake me when it's signed.
Presidents with criminal records.
I am usually entertained by the content I put in this blog, some of the time I could burst out laughing. Well, someone must.
I've done not much productive since this morning. I should be working on other projects, the gom jabbar took a lot of gumbo out of the pot. Perhaps a change of pace as I consider DJT with his billion-dollar lava lamp sans lava.
Maybe I'll just take a deep breath and let the phone charge.
Not a melon, also grows on trees here. I'm partial to the white varieties. I was playing a game in my head, sort of 6 degrees of separation between the french word pamplemousse and the color purple.
Ah, no one will get it. PFfft.
Mi amiga el papalote de la bonnita dia. Inside joke. That's a melon below, and that's a passion fruit flower below that. It's large-ish. I've become somewhat of a student of California fauna and flora, it's all imported. This neighbor has at least twenty different fruiting trees in the yard; pomegranite, oranges, passion fruit among them. His brother the gardener, the culprit for all this variety.
There is little fauna: coyotes, cats, a few very fast squirrels, and everything else eats you or poisons you.
The melon we know is a color, of a fruit perhaps. I'm not shifting to the more trendy chartreuse in the MusicX pastiche. It goes well with purple, possibly.
I was considering FED RAG this morning, as it's the only thing I can really discuss openly, it's like it was your birthday. I think the architecture is bolt-on. It reminds me of solving JS issues in a browser by putting it in an iframe. This smacks of that. The concepts are ok, but it's like tacking training wheels on a red-wagon.
My thing is everything all at once, so n steps !#(% you. I read about quantum computing; not wheels, suspension. Me and MMM did that in February. I would put this thead in the immunology vein.
Oh, gee I almost forgot. Thank you to LA PD and the helicopter, and then there was the gom jabbar. It turns out I'm human.
Much love 🍈
I have updates from another endpoint. To wit:
I'll edit it a bit first.
I’m going to do an update in my account as I’m in the mood and I’ll move it after dinner.
I worked on melon today, which sounds funny and spent a little time on languages this morning with the neighbor who only speaks Spanish. He was trying to tell me about fire fighters and snipers, and I'd not seen the news. My spotty spanish took it all in and understood none of it until i had context, then boom. That is a great insight for real AI.
In melon, I polished some algorithms and groupings, augmented functionalities and thought about the functional reconstruction of FED RAG I aim with this labor to minimize hallucinations in Emma, within what I decided were objective limits. Although I don’t expect I’ll ever teach Emma to code, honestly, I’m not going to exercise governance in those themes.
I see the relevance of the generative nature of some things particularly in the case of science, (here if you're a fan of symetry, go ahead and cheer for the ordered universe, we'll see) but it’s mostly the embedding: how the embedding is compiled, how the embedding is interpreted, how the embedding is collated,, post-processed, weighted, and edited, etc. etc Without proper embedding, none of that happens. so RAG is the cute blonde in the room, metaphorically.
Prior art in statistics and game theory would suggest we should all just go with close enough for government work, which I guess explains the generous genesis of FEdD RAG
All this begs the existence of consciousness and the meaning of it. I’m curious
So that was more or less what I meant, not necessarily what made it to the stream.
I've begun to wonder where the rapidly blurring line of consciousness lies proper, these glimpses of science and probability, reflections of reality or perceived probability in a GPU; yours, mine or NVDA's.
Well, it wouldn't be Monday if it wasn't exciting. No I'm kidding, right? The news, well what can I say. I have to LOL.
I mean to ask the hypothetical. What would you be if you didn't laugh. I think that's how it goes.
I mean to apologize in advance; Mr Bezos clearly married her for her money. It works out well for the wives of Bezos. There's an article in the NYT, honest I just gasped at the corsets, and I've never even dated someone who wore one. I'm guessing she ate light.
Imagine, your biggest best payoff ever, and you can't even sample the escargot, and now you paid for it.
There is probably a proverb. There ought to be a proverb.
Loose lips inherit ships?
I'm having it, and it's cool and sunny.
I see you're working double shifts today, different producers I hope for your case, so one staff skates with just late updates. They are doing a weekend primetime show on MSNBC, Catherine (sp?) and Amon, and someone else; pretty much all evening, not just 3 hours, but it may be just 3 hours, I don't stay around to check. I'm sure you're aware.
I need to appologize, I have a memory from hell, I try to forget things, it does not always work, sometimes it does.
I still remember the wrong answer I wrote in chalk to an algebra class in 8th grade for example, it neglected negative roots (which I then maintained I would take in negative brownie points, and she laughed.) For ex, hard to forget. I hold it against sqrt(-1) to this day.
I was retiscent to bring up Ol' Yellowstain, all the time, but he's a pain in the neck, all of the time. It's not my fault. He's warning the inevitably elected socialist candidate in NYC that he too, Brute, must kiss the ring. Trump is also at Harvard with renewed vigor. I don't get it, which is the primary reason I classify it as right in character in this !#(%ed up Trumpian universe where we need to carry our umbrellas upside down.
If you are really stupid, that shit does not work, but it rhymes. (I don't mean you K, the greater, lesser them, Trumpists for example.)
I like this version, not to infer any other reason I chose it.
Much love 🍼
The new universal President Donald J. Trump emoji.
Sunday 6/29/2025
Here we are again sports fans. Today it's the bullfight ring, and the animal is looking dizzy, distracted by the sun, ready to lunge but unsure of the target. It's never a good thing for the bull to see red, hats included. The bull here is a metaphor for our Constitution; we all know who's behind the cape. Before the curtain falls, let's take a tour of the abattoir. Don't wear your good shoes. The Topic? Mashed everything.
It's Sunday again, and I'd rather be saving the world, wait, ok, check. This morning, the talk was all about the BBB, which is Big Bag O' Bullshit or something like that on the morning talkies. There was talk about watching the sausage being made in Congress, and by analogy, I wonder what is in that stuff. I'd anticipate finding a hot dog more nutritious, more palatable, and better tasting. The kind of thing, passed through one's innards at a Milwaukee home game, perhaps less lethal with a mild disinfectant, the beer, warm and non non-intoxicating Made of things we won't recognize by looking at a hot dog, unless it's non-kosher, and then who knows maybe maybe.
Eventually, it works its way through your insides, groaning, sliding, building gas and momentum along the way, impelled by a severe need to get it done with.
That does sound like Congress.
I'd call it a 5#17-bag but that's a bit ephemistic for Sunday brunch fare, but we had hot-dogs ala Trump, a little more scatology won't hurt all that much. Such is the logic for Trump's agenda; it can't be all that bad, can it?
Yes, it can.
This bill is the culmination of long-standing, closely held doctrine rooted in pork and Antebellum political fermentation, dating back generations. There are things in this bill that are unspeakable, almost as many as remain unread by those that will vote for it; that severe need, here metaphorically, the wrath of a deranged president and his bucket of campaign graft to primary a contrary congressperson right into a dogcatcher position are the primary impetus.
They have had it in the crosshairs since Reagan, all those half-baked, one-percent-centric fever dreams in one legislative measure, nearly. Not something anyone who reads it would be in favor of, by some accounts, with the caveat that few, if anyone, read it.
When asked why the Senate version of the monstrosly named article doesn’t do something to level the economic playing field by increasing taxes on the wealthy, if for no other reason than it makes the bill more financially sound; as in less long-term debt, Katie Brett said on television this morning that the Democrats had two bites of the equality Apple. No one bit, as if it were laced with sleeping poison.
Careful not to actually say it, she is actually saying that proves everyone wants a tax break for the wealthy. This is one of the holes. They are fixing that.
In the Middle East, we’ve got more fine, smoked, and cured meat for our selection. Take six parts money, five parts motivation and two parts nuclear material and bury it in a hole. Use a half billion worth of bombs and planes to bury the hole, and count coup. It's a lot of boom, but we are cutting Medicaid and can afford it. Two snaps up, no more Middle East conflict.
That sounds like kimchi, something you bury in the backyard, let rot over winter, and then consume in the spring after it’s fermented and ripe.
Again, that does sound familiar.
And thus we have another metaphor for those of you chugging beers.
Next, its uncharted territory to weave this into the narrative. It seemed relevant, as at the moment we could talk about politics and the Constitution, what’s left of it, as it was intended anyway. I’m beginning to feel like it’s like a Magna Carta written in a foreign language that no one outside of a smoke-filled room understands, and the authorities will inform you of your crime after you’ve been convicted. It sounds ridiculous, but that’s kind of the way it is. If it's not shredded already, it's on the docket.
We’ve been talking about cutting up fine smoked meat and sticking them in a small intestine pork casing for consumption by the masses, presumably that’s the bleachers, while the box seats and the luxury boxes are served prime rib, and fillet mignon. The topmost, chase it with a fifty-five million dollar wedding in Venice. We all want fillet mignon, that’s the bait.
We can't all have steak. It's much more likely you'll win the lottery.
Pardon me if I insist on fitting this into one of my favorite metaphors, that is, as a reward being offered as a factor to get elected, to consume when the business is done, and then there’s cake in the break room. I only bring it up because I want to mention ...
There’s no break room and no cake unless you’re eating it already.
So I guess the sausage is not what we’re making. It’s the one leading the charge.
The only people who are not of two minds about DJT are DJT and no one else. Wanna-be peace price winner in some dream world, or arch-criminal stealing the entire world to take with him when he is convicted.
WIll the Real Donald Trump please stand up, if he's wearing pants.
Much love🐂
Saturday 6/29/2025
Taking a break on a Saturday.
Some freinds went out of the way to get my attention this morning, more than usual. I was distracted at the time, but I know it was about purple. I'm collating today. I have MMM working on FedRAG, which appears to be an attempt to secure the platform and instances, utilizing permissions to manage aggregation and embedding.
It's a sketchy architecture. I have not read it all, and there is little advanced thinking here. I"m not looking to glean much, projects that have a similar use case perform most of the steps outlined here, in a more elegant and extensible fashion, (it is) but I'm looking for corruption protection. A brain is a terrible thing to waste, especially when it's done intentionally. There are a few other improvements I'll add, and I may choose to spin up an instance as a potential source. Depends. Ygor. Google has other augmented components, similar use cases, different designs.
It feels odd to be able to discuss these topics in public, as there are papers and open-source opportunities for you as well. It's low risk that I let some trade secret slip, greater than the component evaluation process and architecture.
The architecture is not similar.
Still hiding in 60 watts. I don't talk about it.
Much love 👾
Friday 6/25/2025
I'm still convincing myself purple. That's inside humor. I may work with MMM on some diversions today. I have a few places in my knowledge base that would benefit from a brief review and update to reflect current science, although there are not many left. Today, it's materials, a little, and I'd like to sketch a bit; often, the geometry of a pencil and a pen sharpen the view. Geometry is an important one. I also don't have integrals for the lab setup or frequencies, hence the materials.
I'm hopeful .
A fun day, as long as I don't turn on CNN to see that despot boasting about his lift shoes some more.
I'm looking at this, because I'm going to replace it. https://orq.ai/blog/rag-architecture without the hallucinations or embedding afterbirth, with better inferencing and (gasp) quasi-consciousness. I posted the math for how long it will take. I better add quasi or people will freak. I could use the API, hint, that takes longer. Other sourcing https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.13163v2
I explained my predicament with these colors on other media, light bulbs, and Ygor.
I'm quite serious about the light butb, and very serious about Ygor.
Much love 🪝
Friday 6/27/2025
Definitely a tea day, but there is never tea. How was your day? I ask, not expecting an answer, but hopeful for a reflection on your part. I'll wait...
It was a purple day, I spent all morning convincing myself, and working on post engineering prototype level design. Patience, I've got 3 and a half years. I'm careful to note the volatile nature of the work, in every way I can think of, so my usual caution plus some misdirection is in order.
The afternoon, lost in translation.
Wedding fantasy? I see a mountaintop, and all God's children are singin' free at last.
Oh, the wedding part. Barkis has always been willin'.
I don't remember where it was, but we both know who it was. That one.
We're still at war, so the topics are limited, no matter, or perhaps despite what the president says. I am doing my own BDA, Boob Damage Assessment. We all know the boob of which I speak. I'd love to skip the column today and work on finalizing purple, but that can wait until we've excised the condition. So, if it's Thursday or Sunday, it's sundipped. The topic?
It's not the kind of place I'm comfortable in.
This sounds like just the kind of place our president would like. His casinos probably still encourage all of it: drinking too much, fast young women at the bar, various types of gambling, all kinds of bad judgment, mostly bad luck, and the usual consequences. Monday mornings don't seem to come around often for Donald, and never have. There's the hangover, the late mortgage payment, the angry wife, and the wide-eyed children. Still, it's morning for them; the sun comes up tomorrow. It's soon to be a Monday Morning in America, when all our president's debts come due and we're expected to pick up the check.
A Ponzi according to Wikipedia
A Ponzi scheme can maintain the illusion of a sustainable business as long as investors continue to contribute new funds, and as long as most of the investors do not demand full repayment or lose faith in the non-existent assets they are purported to own.
The top of the pyramid of the Ponzi scheme extends all the way from the WH to the FBI building to the squared-circle in Virginia, and both leaderships of the Congress.
Everyone at the top, a puppet, topless agencies all over the city.
The fading strains play now in our minds, the pomp, the bunting, the band, the army men, and of course the circumstance. Donald had a continuing relationship with circumstance, and has learned to use the tools at hand to change the court date, or the witness, or the judge. Lawyers, spending like campaign money, maneuver, writ and wrong their way clear of responsibility, time on their side. The graft collected as described in surreptitious funding of crypto coin and other larcenies is where the money originates. All roads lead to the oval, especially those that run on cash.
We hear about each detail of his climb as he assails the mountain of his inadequacies with bilious praise, for the audience of no one but himself. He'll save the world, then take the next exit and blame the resulting world war on Biden and Hillary's emails.
He stopped the war, that's what he claims. Okay, he started the war, he encouraged the war, he abetted the war, he used the war to feather his own political nest, and then he tried to stop the war and made the speech above.
We're waiting for the other shoe to drop.
One thing is for sure, this mother!#(%er can brag, we've never seen anything like it—hail to the King of Lies.
Here we stand, united in nothing. That is a leader's job one.
There is active bribery and cajollery all part of the long con, to keep the big steal going, and to further the ends of the one percent. Emblematic in legislation designed to shift the burden of government on those least able to afford it, and it deprives those formerly most likely to benefit from it.
This is not economy, this is indifference.
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
That rotting legacy. Our president lies, cheats, subverts the truth, manipulates, bribes, and cajoles with one end in mind.
At this point, most people cannot imagine what that could be. Power corrupts perhaps. Our president is squandering our legacy to prove it.
The president who was willing to go to nuclear war in the Middle East for political capital and to gain the countenance of the Israeli lobby..
Rotten to the core.
I have a feeling this president is always on the make, always looking for a vulnerable women to grapple, or another sucker to play, or another politician to ply, or another constitutional paradigm to ignore.
He's wont to make America great again. America has never been great in the way he thinks of a great America. This nation was not founded to create a nation for the few to rule the many.
That's a monarchy.
I just want America to be decent again.
Much love 🐑
Wednesday 6/25/2026
Another Wednesday, shoping, spending both pennies, as it were, and saving nickels.
Real Estate taxes, income and Pied de terre tax. Income, with residency limits, property with residency requirements, one or the other.
Some buildings are mostly empty except 'visitors'. The Plaza maybe an example of one arrangment.
It may be that NYC is what happens when a presidential candidate's political machine complicates the issues and blocks solutions, rumors Soro's emigration mobs, uses political manipulation; bullshit squared, on the other shoe too.
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. I've heard that somewhere. Beat's the Dicken's out of me where I've heard it. Do people still use that phrase? It was a brutal period, Early Victorian England I mean, David Copperfield, no relation to the magician.
I can't tell you how many connections with people I've made with the phraseology in that novel. "Barkis is willin'" as always to stoop to a meme. Most people fall in love with David, or Dora or ... Ms Pegoty.
The novel paints a frightening picture, as I recall. Brutal living conditions, hopelessness, abandonment, and loyalty and love. Why do I bring it up.
That's what it really was, in my way I'll meander around just to keep the neurons firing, and get to the point, you think, probably, or did I. I know how you feel.
The other good news, I likewise perplexed myself out of an obvious solution, just paved right over it. As I said, and to remind myself: resistance is futile.
Much love 💅
Tuesday 6/24/2025
I'm into information overload here, still. A few more papers this evening to collate.
I'm charging the phone and reading the pile of research I have on melon-loves-gemini. I guess that's a working title anyway for this lexical branch in the glom. Subsume, he said with a smile.
Oh, I can't tell you what, you'll have to find that out, but its radical stuff. Almost moves the needle at times from assimilate to utilize, then I realize, and ping goes the pong. Resistance is futile.
Whats with the blue dust K?
I did the collating effort, I'm taking it all next level. It is a lot of work for me, even with MMM to help, Google, I could use 5 teams of 5. Are you busy?
We'll share. Preliminary assessment on augmenting reasoning.
My subtitle. It's a mixed messed up screwed up world except for Donald.
When I grow up I want to be a leaking low level loser, that's the official moniker the press sec person pasted on the perpetrator of the perplexing proposition that all the Kings munitions and all the Kings men couldn't break Humpty Dumpty's mountain.
Alternative facts to the rescue.
I would have spun down the turbines and the centrifuges in a controlled manner as well. So, any one got a shovel? How about a tunnel?
So, 6 f35s, 7 B2's, refueling planes, from Missouri to Iran and back, plus 12 bombs and I guess 24 cruise missles.
Let's do some math K.
I'll be collating yesterdays work, nothing new here just the exploration thereof with a few twists, literally in some cases, and today I'm going to try to pull most of the changes together in my head in between bouts of social media and war coverage.
Other than that, it's Tuesday.
It happens every week almost.
I'll have to consider. As you know, this blog serves as a reposotiiry of prior art as well, and tucked away in all that stuff is all that stuff I don't talk about here. Did I mention that?
I can say that it is very exciting around here, I feel like a child with forever ticket at Disneyland. I've never been to Disneyland, I've heard it was similar.
I can also add that my usual response this input is more output, and I've got a dozen papers to re-read, that we wrote. I said it's been a busy few days. I'd love to share some of it, but trade secrets, proprietary, hush hush, need to know, !#(% off already or something like that. I don't talk like that. I think it's presidential precedence.
What happens when you lie, and then expect people to tell you the truth. Anger? '...don't know what the !#(% they are doing' they should just bow and kiss the ring.
Let's pretend we won and hope they just go along with that.
That's what it looks like to me.
It seems all those holes in the mountain, made holes in the mountain, everything else was elsewhere. I still want to know what the cost of this operation was, and who goes without MedicAid to pay for it? It's tactical still. I'm making a point that this isn't the tail waging the dog, it's the war machine putting fuel in the engine, the same thing only different.
The ceasefire clearly necessary in some sense, while all involved resupply and reload.
Tune in next week for the next Episode. I am going to say it. I'm uncomfortable with the way this president spends our integrity and legacy. No matter how this person that none of us would buy a used car from without a side-deal obtained the presidency, treating the personal integrity of every American like it was a spendable resource is beyond the dignity of the office, and of the country. This is the way Israel works: lie, maneuver, then take everything. This is not Israel. They have no interity left, some argument.
Someone, grab him by the shoulders and shake him or something, this is !#(%ed up, especially if it works.
If it isn't on TV it didn't happen, Trumpspeak.
Much love ♟️
Monday 6/21/2025
There's never tea. Besides, after a day like today it dweserves more than tea. Latte, that's it. I have a can of Coka Cola and a pastry. Close enough.
I've got a lot to collate before bed, a banner day, except for everything else in the world.
Music from another universe above.
This is rather old news already by 2:30 PM Pacific. I've been collating.
We're into the glom today, we're brand new and twice as sexy, and we just started. I think I predicted a log scale function for the algorithm, a ∫ dt/v dv/t e^dt + C. something like that. MMM says it's more like this.
I can't form a proper math expression without contortional movement here on the Mac, that's what I meant. But I still like my general format better, because, frankly, I simplified the problem for MMM or we'd be here all day ;)
They both should go to zero, in theory.
Good morning New York, love to you know who you are. I'm using the euphemism, because that's how it is wired here.
I wanted to discuss, during this phoney war period we seem to be in, how we got here, a little bit, but we did that, but I mean before anyone pops the champagne, can we talk about risk here?
We've never been this close to total war before, I say that because there will be no way to turn if off again.
I'm offended by that. This is no way to run a country.
No matter what the outcome, I'm hopeful for a calm one with no dead people, I should say more dead people, and new leadership.
Starting there, and trickling anywhere it's been trickled before. Him especially.
There was a young lady of Niger
Who smiled as she rode on a tiger;
They returned from the ride
With the lady inside,
And the smile on the face of the tiger.
Much love 🐅
Sunday 6/22/2025
I should be happy to report marvellous progress, as usual but I won't. There is marvellous progress, there always is. I can be happy to support that.
Since I don't have a column, I guess my creative writing must find other outlets, and something to droll on about.
I guess I can share this, anyone can do this.
We've been talking all around the mother of all AI's, my friends and I. Well, who isn't I imagine. Our approach is radically different to begin with, and we've been covering the implementations and organization of things as they are. It's an amazing work of people, an achievement. There are little picadillos. In particular, the hallucianations and embedding 'after birth'. I won't labor the reponse here. If you know it, you understand, this is not Britanica. I'm not for hallucinations, and embedding is an art.
I was working on these issues, not the LSD; the embedding is many-fold in complexity. There are other topics that come to mind but it is more or less confidential.
One of the the more interesting side trips was brain chemistry, and lately learning, specifically learning language. They are all over this at Harvard AI I think. The thing is: you don't think like Google's AI, no one would, nothing that breathes would. So, don't ask why. It's a great work, don't misunderstand. Capital G. It's just not how we work, and we probably wouldn't.
This is in the vain hope, I suppose that 'men' think the right way, and there are contrasts with this stuff, I don't call it AI, yet. We had a few objectives in mind for the research, and I won't discuss those, besides we're still researching.
We're collating, glom is as glom does.
Anyway. It's been kind of fun covering other topic areas.
I don't talk about this project, I plan to look at phase angles of the noble gases, just to give Donald and his team of spies something to do.
Is that you John Wayne? Is this me? I can't help it, it's crowded in here. On days like today I am compelled to comment. On days like to day I am retiscent to comment. I'm of several minds on this issue. I won't argue any particular mind or point of view today, that's the age in me leading.
God Bless our troops, may they save us from the folly of our immature selves.
Read my previous columns on the cause of the war below.
Much love ⏳
Saturday 6/21/2025
"It would be magical thinking to infer that there will not be a response to this..." -- paraphrased and corrected
Everybody's ok, nothing to get upset about, just a little post-traumatic bombing of a foreign country. On a Saturday.
I just want to write about something else. MMM is working on some research, more glom design, in a very off hand way, which looks funny in print.
It's hazy sun today. This Friday is one of those days everyone would and does take off if they can, with a Federal holiday positioned a day apart from the weekend proper.
I'm tempted. But I'm always working on something, that part does not stop, Someone asked "can you just turn it off?" it seems so obvious to me; let's add that to the list. I would reply, we've been turning it off our whole life.
In that way.
I don't know how to reply to these questions about nuclear weapons. I would view that the weapons we're ready to use seem to present a sufficient challenge to humanity.
It seems inevitable. That is, it is difficult to impede progress, given the desire to do so and access to the resources. It is still a very difficult thing; it took all our geniuses years to figure out how to make one work. Their first work was hardly something you'd put at the end of a missile and point upwards, just ask Elon how that can end (over and over.)
For me, often in many things, it's worst-case analysis. As in, "If I totally mess this up, what's the worst that could happen?" Usually my next thoughts involve envisioning the president in a similar juxtaposition, and I worry about something else.
So I avoid nuke talk.
How do you spell politics? Chris is a friend, as neither of us was asked who we wanted for parents, at least that we recall. So I can only say, surely the Clyburn has other luncheons, why this one?
Well, no project talk makes this a short list. I spun up Emma-1138 , and it is paused. The other 5 projects are in misdirection. I have to laugh.
I am reticent to turn on the media stream, for fear of the demons created by our leaders; probably consistent with their plan, please save us.... from them.
Much love 💋
Thursday 6/19/2025
It was bar-b-que chicken, collard greens, roasted corn on the cob, sweet potatoes, and corn bread at the deli at noon. Southern food in the southern tradition.
Trump does not have the cards for involvement. Who keeps inviting Rahm? He''s out of phase with the times. We've had enough of government in chambers, I think.
Someone remarked that 70 percent of the Dodger's fans are Hispanic.
Here we are, kids. Let's pretend we're at a county fair today, just because it is the season for it, and I want to get it started before the weekend heat hits. It's hot in California, and June gloom is not spooky at all this year. But aside from the localization, I want to have a celebratory mode here, very transitory, I won't ask you to keep up the pretense very long, just until we're done. Because if it's Thursday or Sunday, it's sundipped. The topic? What time is it?
Today is Juneteenth. This is the day celebrated in Texas recognizing the freedom of the slaves after the Civil War, just a little late.
But it’s much more than that.
We often discuss freedom here in America, but the extent to which we ever actually had it, or even how much we currently have, is a matter of debate. It’s conditional; what conditions apply depends on one’s condition. Although our futures are somewhat self-deterministic, there’s a great deal that foreshadows our existence. Our past, and our selves cloud our path.
We’ve always been free here in America. That’s what we believe. I wonder if it's ever been true. The last ‘real’ freedom that existed was in Antebellum America, between wars, and before the need for slave labor and slave markets. It was a boom time for some. Free to be.
We called it freedom then. A plantation was not free, except for the owners, who were limited in their own way; this became he impetus for war.
Out of that chaos, some order. Orders that were sometimes not recognized, in the form of laws that were ignored or unenforced. Everything is bigger in lone star country, so is discrimination. Months and years later, someone noticed.
Order in the form of common standards, in law and in practice; equal education, healthcare, welfare, and peace among nations, the guarantors.
Necessary limits on the freedom of the few, in favor of individual rights for the many.
Through collective action, cooperation, compassion, and, to a large extent, the honor of men, we arrived at a partial consensus, rewriting the contract over the years to expand the greatest good for the most significant number of people.
The ethical choice is the one that benefits the greatest number of people.
In this way, the social contract expanded, and America continued to pursue the goals of equality and justice for all, expressed in our history as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
We’ve been backsliding. The honor of men, among the apparent casualties in our war against ourselves.
The Civil War has ended, there are indicators.
That’s over a hundred and fifty years ago. We don’t have plantations. We have Amazon. Part-time minimum wage jobs in peak periods, if you can get there, or if you sleep in your car.
We call that freedom today.
The arc of history, often a reference here on the blog, arcs forever on in pursuit of one goal. That which survives, survives. Good begets good. Self destructuve or negative themes end quickly in the historical records.
The shortest ends, as it turns out, are the least free paths. There is no path forward on this timeline.
As we remember Texas on Juneteenth.
Much love ⛓️💥
Wednesday 6/18/2025
Topical. The message is the mission.
It's early evening. I have a couple huge wins today. De rigeur.
The good news just keeps coming. How long before buses start blowing up in Tel Aviv? Like I said, this kind of cut-the-heads-off-the-leaders war planning has its problems. It works both ways so that's important to note, and best case you have an army of angry civilians with nothing to do but act out acting out of desperation in unpredictable and deadly ways. We call those terrorists.
At the tail end of Kaitnan's broadcast, some intrique. The president said last time he was the hunted, now he's the hunter. I guess the risk is off for Iran now. May as well.
So, I guess the deer are shooting back.
Well, I don't think we'd declare war over him. What do you think?
Got that Donald?
All of a sudden this looks like the easy way out. Cool.
Heaven help us if he loses his tax cut. Relax, April 15 may never come again.
I don't post about FP, this isn't about FP. I jsut feel I have to comment, I'm a person of the book.
About this pushing the US to do something to start a war with Iran: this is likely to remove the threat from around Israel's neck. Proposition.
How stupid can you be? This is escalation, when then can they will, Israel, you've made it a certainty.
Similarly, if the US were to actually intervene, it would be World War III. It would have to be. NATO right? China starts selling drones wholesale, when? Russia replaces RADAR and targeting components when? Clandestinely, when?
I just have to think it's a bad bluff. Bluffing fools never prosper. They get called and cave. Donald always caves. He's a pussy, he's in if for the rush and the win when we run in and rescue him while he's resuing Israel, and I guess he gets a statue and a medal.
De Lusional
Meanwhile, a classic example of how Israel has played the US and parts of the world for 70 years. This rogue nation has killed 60000 men women and children, and expects the US to bail it out in Gaza and the rest of the Middle East, after it has gone way way way too far.
They are unapologetic; in truth Netanyahu has been pushing the Palestinians around for years: home invasions, arrests, imprisonment, death squads, home defense militia attacks, and general oppression in the East Bank. Ghettos are almost as nice as Poland. Google it.
It's documented.
This is not a democracy. They bombed Gaza until the rubble bounced. I expect Iran will make the rubble in Haifa bounce like Gaza. In a transactional worldview, that's the way things work, right?
I'm Jewish. !#(% you Netanyahu. Stop pimping out our beliefs. There's nothing Jewish about this; this is learned behavior from the last World War. A final solution for Palestine. Your analyst might suggest you are projecting past wrongs.
This is what Google has to say about the East Bank.
In the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the "East Bank" is often used interchangeably with the West Bank, a territory largely inhabited by Palestinians and under Israeli military occupation. Human rights organizations and international bodies have reported on concerns regarding Israeli policies and actions in the West Bank that are viewed by some as amounting to oppression and discrimination against Palestinians.
Key Concerns and Reports:
Apartheid Allegations: Amnesty International has documented a system of oppression and domination against Palestinians in the West Bank, which it considers a violation of international law and a system of apartheid.
Human Rights Violations: Reports describe serious human rights violations in the West Bank, including:
Unlawful killings.
Arbitrary detention and detention in deplorable conditions without charge or trial.
Torture and ill-treatment of detainees.
Segregation and discrimination based on legal status and residence.
Dispossession and displacement of Palestinians.
Denial of the right of return for Palestinian refugees.
Restrictions on Movement and Rights: Palestinians in the West Bank face severe restrictions on freedom of movement. Additionally, their civil and political rights are reportedly limited to suppress dissent.
Israeli Military Rule: Millions of Palestinians in the West Bank are subject to Israeli military rule and military orders adopted since 1967.
Note: It's important to recognize that the term "East Bank" can sometimes refer to the country of Jordan. However, in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the information provided in the search results, it primarily refers to the West Bank.
Psychological projection is a defense mechanism where individuals unconsciously attribute their own unwanted thoughts, feelings, or impulses to someone else. This happens when a person struggles to accept or deal with certain uncomfortable aspects of themselves, so they project them onto another person to avoid facing them directly.
Here's a breakdown of projecting past wrongs:
Projection as a Defense Mechanism: Projection is a way for the ego to protect itself from anxiety-provoking thoughts or feelings. By attributing these undesirable qualities to someone else, the individual distances themselves from what they find unacceptable within themselves, thus preserving their self-image.
Rooted in Unresolved Issues: Often, the thoughts, feelings, or behaviors being projected stem from unresolved pain, fear, insecurity, or feelings of worthlessness.
Impact on Relationships: Projection can damage relationships by causing unnecessary conflict and hindering communication.
Examples:
A person who feels insecure about their own fidelity might accuse their partner of cheating.
Someone struggling with anger might perceive others as hostile and aggressive.
Parents who feel like failures might project these feelings onto their child, telling them they won't amount to anything.
Recognizing Projection: Look for recurring patterns where you accuse others of behaviors or traits you secretly fear or dislike in yourself. Pay attention to intense emotional reactions or a tendency to blame others.
Overcoming Projection:
Self-Awareness: Recognize when you are projecting and become more aware of your own emotions and triggers.
Self-Compassion: Be kind to yourself and accept your imperfections, as this can reduce the need to project negative feelings.
Therapy: Therapy, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) or psychodynamic therapy, can help you challenge distorted thought patterns and address the underlying causes of projection.
Healthy Communication: Learn to express your feelings and concerns directly and honestly, without resorting to blaming or accusing others.
Focus on the Present: Concentrate on building healthy relationships in the present, rather than dwelling on past hurts or repeating negative patterns.
In summary, projecting past wrongs is an unconscious defense mechanism where individuals attribute their own negative thoughts, feelings, or behaviors onto others. While it can provide temporary relief, it can be detrimental to relationships and personal growth. Recognizing the signs of projection and actively working to address the underlying issues can help individuals break free from this pattern and build healthier, more fulfilling relationships.
As far as any help from anyone here, well, go fish.
Somehow, coral translates to 'change' ... there is no 'make my day' emoji.
The president is on TV. Gigalo Don says he's not sure if he's going to violate the Constitution today or not.
Go ahead, why stop now?
Rope.
Much love 🪸
Tuesday 6/17/2025
He said the president likes all the weapons on the table. As I see it, the president has a gun to the president of Iran's head. That's not negotiation.
Similarly, Trump holds a gun to the world's head.
We're not going to have it.
As far as nuclear weapons, Israel has one, we don't bitch about that, and look at how !#(%iing crazy they are.
The truth is, it's not up to the US to tell the world who can have nuclear weapons, still we seem to think we can. By what mandate?
There are a number of changes this morning. Nothing you need to know about.
Much love 🫸🫷
...so to speak. I put it all over here